Skip to content
Freelancer RightsKnow what you are owed, and why

Court dispute group

Frisch v Likeopedia, LLC

Records preserved here
2 records — an opinion count, not a count of dockets or filings
Court(s)
Supreme Court, New York County; U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Docket number(s)
Index No. 651876/2021; SDNY 23-cv-3904 (VM), Doc. 34
Citation(s)
2023 NY Slip Op 31564(U)
Latest record in this collection
August 26, 2024 — this is the latest document collected, not a docket-status check
Where these records came from
Initial 40-result opinion search; citation_records.json (September 6, 2026 citation expansion)

Read this alongside the records

  • The state and federal actions are grouped as one dispute; the federal case followed discontinuance of the state action.

Opinion history

Ordered oldest to newest. Summaries describe what each document says; they do not endorse any court’s reading of the statute.

  1. May 8, 2023Direct FIFA rulingRecord 1

    Frisch v Likeopedia, LLC

    Court
    Supreme Court, New York County
    Docket
    Index No. 651876/2021
    Citation
    2023 NY Slip Op 31564(U)
    Why it is here
    Consultant asserted an NYC FIFA payment claim.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    Dismissal of FIFA claim denied; alleged NYC residence and work sufficed at the pleading stage.
    Award
    No award in this ruling
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Geographic scope; consulting
    Where this appears in the document
    PDF printed page 4.
    Review scope
    Opinion relevance and stated ruling only; full docket and later treatment not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

  2. August 26, 2024Additional case historyRecord 2

    Frisch v. Likeopedia, LLC

    Court
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Docket
    SDNY 23-cv-3904 (VM), Doc. 34
    Why it is here
    Located through the citation-expansion pass.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    FIFA claim survives against Likeopedia, but is dismissed against Rivero individually because he was not the hiring party. Federal continuation after discontinuance of the state action already in this collection; no separate dispute added.
    Award
    No damages awarded in this ruling
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Citation-expansion addition
    Where this appears in the document
    Background; section III(D); disposition.
    Found through
    • SF Entities v. Gamburg (2025), FIFA discussion
    • Ortiz v. Consolidated Edison (2025), FIFA discussion
    Review scope
    Later history not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

Citation connections

Verified discovery trail

How this matter was located during the citation-expansion pass.

  • Found through SF Entities v. Gamburg (2025), FIFA discussion. Additional case history
  • Found through Ortiz v. Consolidated Edison (2025), FIFA discussion. Additional case history

Citation candidates — pending review

These are selected citation candidates extracted from opinion text, reconciled to a matter in this library. They are not a verified table of authorities, not confirmed precedent, and imply no endorsement.

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., LLC

    …rate that their work had an "impact within the city." (see Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., 68 Misc 3d 385 [Sup Ct, NY County 2020], citing (Hoffman v Parade Pubis., 15 NY3d 285, 290 [201 0]). Here, plaintiff alleged that he res…

Limits on this entry

No comprehensive later-treatment research, full-docket retrieval or payment verification was performed for this matter. Saved files are copies of public records, not certified copies. Snapshot date: September 8, 2026. Full methodology and coverage.