Skip to content
Freelancer RightsKnow what you are owed, and why

Court dispute group

Kenzo Digital Immersive, LLC v Zeitgeist Parallax Inc.

Records preserved here
2 records — an opinion count, not a count of dockets or filings
Court(s)
Supreme Court, New York County
Docket number(s)
Index No. 150452/2021; NY Supreme, New York County 150452/2021; 2022 NY Slip Op 30943(U)
Citation(s)
2022 NY Slip Op 30943(U); 2022 NY Slip Op 30944(U)
Latest record in this collection
March 23, 2022 — this is the latest document collected, not a docket-status check
Where these records came from
Initial 40-result opinion search; citation_records.json (September 6, 2026 citation expansion)

Opinion history

Ordered oldest to newest. Summaries describe what each document says; they do not endorse any court’s reading of the statute.

  1. March 23, 2022Direct FIFA rulingRecord 1

    Kenzo Digital Immersive, LLC v Zeitgeist Parallax Inc.

    Court
    Supreme Court, New York County
    Docket
    Index No. 150452/2021
    Citation
    2022 NY Slip Op 30944(U)
    Why it is here
    FIFA counterclaims include retaliation, and the court considers which allegations may remain in the pleading.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    Court struck allegations concerning threatened litigation in settlement negotiations as unnecessary to the retaliation counterclaim; this is a pleading ruling, not final FIFA liability.
    Award
    No award in this ruling
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Retaliation; settlement allegations
    Where this appears in the document
    PDF printed page 4; operative order near beginning.
    Review scope
    Opinion relevance and stated ruling only; full docket and later treatment not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

  2. March 23, 2022Additional case historyRecord 2

    Kenzo Digital Immersive, LLC v. Zeitgeist Parallax Inc.

    Court
    Supreme Court, New York County
    Docket
    NY Supreme, New York County 150452/2021; 2022 NY Slip Op 30943(U)
    Citation
    2022 NY Slip Op 30943(U)
    Why it is here
    Located through the citation-expansion pass.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    Separate order striking settlement-negotiation allegations from FIFA counterclaims as irrelevant to retaliation. Same docket as the previously collected 30944(U) opinion. The 30943 citation is a real additional opinion, not a typo.
    Award
    No damages awarded in this ruling
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Citation-expansion addition
    Where this appears in the document
    Opinion pp. 1, 3-4 (PDF pp. 2, 4-5).
    Found through
    • Rocha v. Tea at Five on Broadway (2025), retaliation discussion
    Review scope
    Later history not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

Citation connections

Verified discovery trail

How this matter was located during the citation-expansion pass.

  • Found through Rocha v. Tea at Five on Broadway (2025), retaliation discussion. Additional case history

Limits on this entry

No comprehensive later-treatment research, full-docket retrieval or payment verification was performed for this matter. Saved files are copies of public records, not certified copies. Snapshot date: September 8, 2026. Full methodology and coverage.