Ortiz et al. v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. et al.
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
- Docket
- SDNY 1:22-cv-08957, Document 294
- Why it is here
- Alternative NYC FIFA claims against an indirect engager.
- Preserved summary of what the court did
- Court denied Con Edison’s motion to dismiss the alternative NYC FIFA claims, finding hiring-party status sufficiently alleged despite indirect engagement through subcontractors. Pleading-stage decision, not a liability finding or damages award.
- Award
- No damages awarded in this ruling
- Claim amount
- Unknown
- Ultimate outcome
- Not verified
- Issues
- Hiring party; subcontractor engagement; pleading stage
- Where this appears in the document
- Section addressing the alternative NYC FIFA claims.
- Review scope
- Court opinion reproduced by Justia; PDF saved; later history not comprehensively checked.
Source and saved documents
- Source document — Court opinion reproduced by Justia
- Download: Saved court PDF (reproduced by Justia, unmodified)