Skip to content

Court dispute group

Provenzano v Orwel

Records preserved here
1 record — an opinion count, not a count of dockets or filings
Court(s)
Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
Docket number(s)
Index No. SC-000651-21/NY
Citation(s)
2024 NY Slip Op 51663(U)
Latest record in this collection
December 10, 2024 — this is the latest document collected, not a docket-status check
Where these records came from
Initial 40-result opinion search

Read this alongside the records

  • Money awarded on other legal grounds must not be described as FIFA recovery.

Opinion history

Ordered oldest to newest. Summaries describe what each document says; they do not endorse any court’s reading of the statute.

  1. December 10, 2024Direct FIFA rulingRecord 1

    Provenzano v Orwel

    Court
    Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
    Docket
    Index No. SC-000651-21/NY
    Citation
    2024 NY Slip Op 51663(U)
    Why it is here
    Small-claims trial directly addresses FIFA payment and written-contract relief.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    FIFA damages denied for failure to establish an enforceable contract and required written-contract request; recovery awarded on unjust enrichment instead.
    Award
    $5,917 plus interest, not FIFA damages
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Oral contract; trial; unjust enrichment
    Where this appears in the document
    84 Misc 3d 1242(A), sections II.C and III.
    Review scope
    Opinion relevance and stated ruling only; full docket and later treatment not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

Citation connections

Citation candidates — pending review

These are selected citation candidates extracted from opinion text, reconciled to a matter in this library. They are not a verified table of authorities, not confirmed precedent, and imply no endorsement.

  • 025 2025 WL 2771708 at *7 [SDNY Sept. 29, 2025] citing Provenzano v Orwel, 223 NYS3d 520 [Civ Ct, NY County 2024 ]). While Plaintiff relies on Tan v. Breathing.AI LLC, 79 Misc.3d 121 l(A) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County 2023) this relian

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., LLC

    otect freelance workers who were denied compensation" (see Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., LLC, 68 Misc 3d 385 , b387, 127 N.Y.S.3d 260 [Sup Ct, NY County 2020], citing Caitlin M. Baranowski, Freelance Isn't Free: The High Cost

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Chen v Romona Keveza Collection LLC

    es, 12 Brooklyn J Corp Fin & Com L 439, 443 [2018]; see also Chen v Romona Keveza Collection LLC, 208 AD3d 152 , 155, 173 N.Y.S.3d 201 [2022]), specifically regarding freelance workers' rights to a written contract upon request,

Limits on this entry

No comprehensive later-treatment research, full-docket retrieval or payment verification was performed for this matter. Saved files are copies of public records, not certified copies. Snapshot date: September 8, 2026. Full methodology and coverage.