Skip to content

Court dispute group

Tan v Breathing.AI LLC

Records preserved here
1 record — an opinion count, not a count of dockets or filings
Court(s)
Supreme Court, New York County
Docket number(s)
Index No. 650043/2023
Citation(s)
2023 NY Slip Op 50593(U)
Latest record in this collection
June 20, 2023 — this is the latest document collected, not a docket-status check
Where these records came from
Initial 40-result opinion search

Opinion history

Ordered oldest to newest. Summaries describe what each document says; they do not endorse any court’s reading of the statute.

  1. June 20, 2023Direct FIFA rulingRecord 1

    Tan v Breathing.AI LLC

    Court
    Supreme Court, New York County
    Docket
    Index No. 650043/2023
    Citation
    2023 NY Slip Op 50593(U)
    Why it is here
    Consultant alleges lack of written agreement and nonpayment under FIFA.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    Written-contract claim partly time-barred; remaining FIFA claims survived. Quasi-contract claims dismissed as duplicative.
    Award
    No award in this ruling
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Written contract; limitations; compensation
    Where this appears in the document
    79 Misc 3d 1211(A), section I and disposition.
    Review scope
    Opinion relevance and stated ruling only; full docket and later treatment not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

Citation connections

Citation candidates — pending review

These are selected citation candidates extracted from opinion text, reconciled to a matter in this library. They are not a verified table of authorities, not confirmed precedent, and imply no endorsement.

  • Pending candidateCited by Hartman v Pilata Inc.

    a nonpayment issue.” A Court recently addressed this issue in Tan v. Breathing AI LLC. In Tan, the Honorable Gerald Lebovits held that where a plaintiff was allegedly in negotiations to be an equity partner rather than an indepen

  • Pending candidateCited by McNamara v Negative, Inc.

    ing suit was barred as untimely, but the rest could continue. Tan v. Breathing.AI LLC, 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2963 *6 (Sup. Ct. June 20, 2023). The continuing wrong doctrine is an exception to the general statute oflimitations rul

  • 025 2025 WL 2771708 at *7 [SDNY Sept. 29, 2025] citing Provenzano v Orwel, 223 NYS3d 520 [Civ Ct, NY County 2024 ]). While Plaintiff relies on Tan v. Breathing.AI LLC, 79 Misc.3d 121 l(A) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County 2023) this relian

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., LLC

    r short-term tasks rather than for full-time employment." (Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., LLC., 68 Misc 3d 385 , 388 [Sup Ct, NY County 2020].) Defendants imply that plaintiff's "voluntary investment of time in a start-up in t

Limits on this entry

No comprehensive later-treatment research, full-docket retrieval or payment verification was performed for this matter. Saved files are copies of public records, not certified copies. Snapshot date: September 8, 2026. Full methodology and coverage.