Skip to content
Freelancer RightsKnow what you are owed, and why

Court dispute group

Varn v. Orchestrade, Inc.

Records preserved here
1 record — an opinion count, not a count of dockets or filings
Court(s)
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Docket number(s)
EDNY 19-cv-2875 (MKB); removed from Kings 509102/2019
Citation(s)
None reported
Latest record in this collection
March 26, 2022 — this is the latest document collected, not a docket-status check
Where these records came from
citation_records.json (September 6, 2026 citation expansion)

Read this alongside the records

  • The initial March 2020 Varn ruling is a source link with partial research captures only; the 2022 opinion is saved as readable text.

Opinion history

Ordered oldest to newest. Summaries describe what each document says; they do not endorse any court’s reading of the statute.

  1. March 26, 2022New case groupRecord 1

    Varn v. Orchestrade, Inc.

    Court
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    Docket
    EDNY 19-cv-2875 (MKB); removed from Kings 509102/2019
    Why it is here
    Located through the citation-expansion pass.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    The 2020 ruling allowed the FIFA claim past dismissal. This 2022 opinion grants defendants summary judgment on FIFA underpayment and retaliation claims under the sales-representative exclusion. Contract issues remained. One dispute, two stages.
    Award
    No damages awarded in this ruling
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Citation-expansion addition
    Where this appears in the document
    Sections I(b), II(b) and conclusion. Initial 2020 ruling separately located at https://app.midpage.ai/document/varn-v-orchestrade-inc-1000128987199; local initial captures are partial.
    Found through
    • SF Entities v. Gamburg (2025) cites the March 2020 Varn ruling
    • Ward v. Cohen Media Publications (2023), FIFA discussion, cites Varn (2020)
    Review scope
    Later history not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

Citation connections

Quoted citations in the saved opinion

Each line below was read in the saved document itself, with the page it appears on. A citation shows that the court referred to the other matter; it is not an endorsement of the outcome, and this is not a full table of authorities.

  • Quoted in the documentCited by Petty v. Maison Hospitality Furnishings et al.

    …Petty (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2026), original PDF p. 11: See e.g., Varn, 2020 WL 13558690, at *6 (finding that an out-of-state defendant supervising the plaintiff’s work “via text message, phone, or email” while Plaintiff was located in New York, supported a showing that defendant transacted business in New York)…

Verified discovery trail

How this matter was located during the citation-expansion pass.

  • Found through SF Entities v. Gamburg (2025) cites the March 2020 Varn ruling. New case group
  • Found through Ward v. Cohen Media Publications (2023), FIFA discussion, cites Varn (2020). New case group

Limits on this entry

No comprehensive later-treatment research, full-docket retrieval or payment verification was performed for this matter. Saved files are copies of public records, not certified copies. Snapshot date: September 8, 2026. Full methodology and coverage.