Skip to content
Freelancer RightsKnow what you are owed, and why

Court dispute group

Buttar v Elite Limousine Plus, Inc.

Records preserved here
2 records — an opinion count, not a count of dockets or filings
Court(s)
Supreme Court, New York County
Docket number(s)
Index No. 651088/2019
Citation(s)
2022 NY Slip Op 31035(U); 2024 NY Slip Op 33220(U)
Latest record in this collection
September 13, 2024 — this is the latest document collected, not a docket-status check
Where these records came from
Initial 40-result opinion search

Read this alongside the records

  • The 2022 decision dismisses the FIFA claim; the 2024 result is later history, not a fresh FIFA ruling.

Opinion history

Ordered oldest to newest. Summaries describe what each document says; they do not endorse any court’s reading of the statute.

  1. March 29, 2022Direct FIFA rulingRecord 1

    Buttar v Elite Limousine Plus, Inc.

    Court
    Supreme Court, New York County
    Docket
    Index No. 651088/2019
    Citation
    2022 NY Slip Op 31035(U)
    Why it is here
    Drivers asserted written-contract, payment and retaliation violations against Elite.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    FIFA cause dismissed because Elite was not adequately alleged to be a hiring party; case included other claims.
    Award
    No FIFA award in this ruling
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Hiring party; intermediary
    Where this appears in the document
    PDF printed pages 18-20, section E.
    Review scope
    Opinion relevance and stated ruling only; full docket and later treatment not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

  2. September 13, 2024Related procedural decisionRecord 2

    Buttar v Elite Limousine Plus, Inc.

    Court
    Supreme Court, New York County
    Docket
    Index No. 651088/2019
    Citation
    2024 NY Slip Op 33220(U)
    Why it is here
    Same Buttar lawsuit; FIFA appears in background, but the 2022 opinion dismissed that claim against Elite.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    Later class-certification and summary-judgment decision concerning remaining claims; do not treat it as a fresh FIFA merits outcome.
    Award
    Do not attribute non-FIFA damages to FIFA
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Case history; remaining claims
    Where this appears in the document
    Opening background; final decretal paragraphs; compare 2022 NY Slip Op 31035(U).
    Review scope
    Opinion relevance and stated ruling only; full docket and later treatment not comprehensively checked

    Source and saved documents

Citation connections

Citation candidates — pending review

These are selected citation candidates extracted from opinion text, reconciled to a matter in this library. They are not a verified table of authorities, not confirmed precedent, and imply no endorsement.

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., LLC

    …o protect freelance workers who were denied compensation” (Turner v Sheppard Grain Enters., LLC, 68 Misc 3d 385, 387 [Sup Ct, NY County 2020, citing Caitlin M. Baranowski, Freelance Isn’t Free: The High Cost of New York City’s F…

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Iams v 10X Mgt. LLC

    …hiring party for purposes of pleading a FIFA violation (see Iams v 10X Mgt. LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 31772[U], *5 [Sup Ct, NY County 2020] [dismissing a FIFA claim where defendant acted as plaintiff’s hiring agent and received a co…

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Van Den Berg v Clinton Hall Holdings, LLC

    …laintiff for its services]). Plaintiffs’ reliance on Van Den Berg v Clinton Hall Holdings, LLC (2019 NY Slip Op 32036[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2019]) is misplaced. The court had denied summary judgment because defendant failed to e…

  • Pending candidateThis matter cites Iams v 10X Mgt. LLC

    …rior to adjudicating each of the claims individually ( see Borden v 400 E. 55th St. Assoc., L.P ., 24 NY3d 382, 400 [2014]), especially given the amounts each individual plaintiff may recover in damages (see Williams v Air Serv.…

Limits on this entry

No comprehensive later-treatment research, full-docket retrieval or payment verification was performed for this matter. Saved files are copies of public records, not certified copies. Snapshot date: September 8, 2026. Full methodology and coverage.