Skip to content
Freelancer RightsKnow what you are owed, and why

Court dispute group

Iams v 10X Mgt. LLC

Records preserved here
1 record — an opinion count, not a count of dockets or filings
Court(s)
Supreme Court, New York County
Docket number(s)
656266/2019
Citation(s)
2020 NY Slip Op 31772(U)
Latest record in this collection
May 29, 2020 — this is the latest document collected, not a docket-status check
Where these records came from
additional_state_records.json (screened lead)

Read this alongside the records

  • The original PDF is not saved locally; only the official source link is available.

Opinion history

Ordered oldest to newest. Summaries describe what each document says; they do not endorse any court’s reading of the statute.

  1. May 29, 2020Direct FIFA rulingRecord 1

    Iams v 10X Mgt. LLC

    Court
    Supreme Court, New York County
    Docket
    656266/2019
    Citation
    2020 NY Slip Op 31772(U)
    Why it is here
    Previously listed as an uncounted research lead; now screened and included.
    Preserved summary of what the court did
    Original FIFA claim dismissed against both defendants; leave to amend granted for FIFA claim against VPV Interactive only. 10X was the freelancer’s agent, not the hiring party. No monetary award in this order.
    Award
    No monetary award in this order
    Claim amount
    Unknown
    Ultimate outcome
    Not verified
    Issues
    Hiring party; agent not hiring party
    Where this appears in the document
    PDF pages 2–3, 5–6, 10, 13–14 (including cover sheet).
    Review scope
    Opinion relevance and stated ruling only; later history not checked

    Source and saved documents

    • Source document — Official New York State Law Reporting Bureau
    • Original PDF is not saved locally for this opinion. Use the official source link.

Citation connections

Citation candidates — pending review

These are selected citation candidates extracted from opinion text, reconciled to a matter in this library. They are not a verified table of authorities, not confirmed precedent, and imply no endorsement.

  • Pending candidateCited by Buttar v Elite Limousine Plus, Inc.

    …hiring party for purposes of pleading a FIFA violation (see Iams v 10X Mgt. LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 31772[U], *5 [Sup Ct, NY County 2020] [dismissing a FIFA claim where defendant acted as plaintiff’s hiring agent and received a co…

  • Pending candidateCited by Buttar v Elite Limousine Plus, Inc.

    …rior to adjudicating each of the claims individually ( see Borden v 400 E. 55th St. Assoc., L.P ., 24 NY3d 382, 400 [2014]), especially given the amounts each individual plaintiff may recover in damages (see Williams v Air Serv.…

Limits on this entry

No comprehensive later-treatment research, full-docket retrieval or payment verification was performed for this matter. Saved files are copies of public records, not certified copies. Snapshot date: September 8, 2026. Full methodology and coverage.