In Chen v. Romona Keveza Collection, an appellate court granted liability to freelancers who used assistants and an agent
Appellate Division, First Department · April 24, 2025 · Index No. 153413/20|Appeal No. 4191|Case No. 2024-03863|
- What the freelancer alleged
- Freelancers, including a model, sued over unpaid work; the hiring party contested whether they qualified as freelance workers given assistants and agency representation.
- What the court actually ruled
- On April 24, 2025, the Appellate Division, First Department granted the freelancers summary judgment on liability against Romona Keveza Collection and otherwise affirmed. An earlier July 2022 appellate decision had reinstated the model's claim.
- The key reason
- The court addressed who qualifies as a freelance worker, including a single-person business that uses assistants and is represented by an agent.
- Stage of the case
- Summary judgment on liability — a finding of liability, not a fixed damages award.
Liability was decided; the amount owed and whether it was paid are separate questions this project has not verified.